?

Log in

No account? Create an account
Previous Entry Share Next Entry
(no subject)
blaisepascal
We're watching1 Ralph Bakshi's J.R.R.Tolkein's The Lord Of The Rings, and once again I'm struck by a thought that I get whenever I seriously consider this story.

The ring. The bloody ring. Throughout the story it is carried either in Frodo's (or some other Ringbearer's) pocket or on a cord around the Ringbearer's neck. Frodo and company are cautioned many times, at different parts, to the dangers of wearing the ring, showing off the ring, losing the ring, etc. And yet, repeatedly, Frodo and company use it, other see it, lose it (but recover it), etc.

Why, oh why, at Rivendell (or even the Shire) didn't Frodo, or one of his advisors, put the ring in a pouch, sew the pouch shut, and secure the pouch to Frodo's clothing or body, concealed under his outer clothing, difficult to lose, show off, or use.

1"Watching" means, for me, paying half attention whilst web-surfing. For skitten it seems to mean napping on and off on the couch.

  • 1
That movie was the one that defined 'suckfest' to me even before I knew the term.

I agree, though. There are so many holes in the story that it's not funny.

  • 1